http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/07/technolo...;ref=technology
Interesting article, with a couple of fun tests. I did very well on the focus test (way better than the multitaskers) but not well on the switching tasks (worse than the multitaskers) so I don't know what that means! From the comments, I wasn't the only one with these results.
(You will notice, of course, the overwhelming preponderance of Apple products in the panorama view of the main subject's work area...
)
To me, the most disturbing thing in the entire article was this paragraph:
QUOTE
Lily, a second-grader, is allowed only an hour a day of unstructured time, which she often spends with her devices. The laptop can consume her.
What happened to just playing? Does this mean that this poor child doesn't have any free time to do as she wishes? Yikes.
The comments are interesting too - lots of reading!
More on the subject:
Is Google making us stupid?
QUOTE
Lily...is allowed only an hour a day of unstructured time
Well, she IS a first grader. She needs to be ready for relational database design by the third grade, after all. 
The Task Switching test was harder than I thought! I had trouble remembering what I was supposed to be looking for, not whether or not it was odd/even/vowel/consonant. It was easier when the number was even and the letter was a vowel and vice versa, of course. But when they mixed them up, I sometimes remembered that I had forgot what to look for!!!
Still, like you, I was much better than the two groups, so I have no idea which one I belong in. I just hope neither group charges dues... I also was slower than either group, I think that's what my red bar below the line means.
I suppose those slower times reflect my stupidity in remembering the last thin I saw on-screen just a split-second ago! Next time, I think I'll use one hand to indicate 'number' or 'letter' and the other to hit the correct arrow key!
Does learning from my mistakes ghet iny eckstra powents?