Techsurvivors

Welcome to Techsurvivors => Community => Topic started by: sokukodo on July 10, 2010, 08:53:26 PM

Title: A Question of Semantics?
Post by: sokukodo on July 10, 2010, 08:53:26 PM
I had always assumed the "rucksack" & "backpack" were two words for the same thing. But is there a difference? Browsing the LL Bean catalogue reveals separate categories, merchandise separated, "Backpacks" over here, "Rucksacks" over there. I'm confused.  unsure.gif
Title: A Question of Semantics?
Post by: Highmac on July 11, 2010, 02:30:10 AM
Well, www.thefreedictionary.com says, quoting Collins English Dictionary:

QUOTE
Rucksack: a large bag, usually having two straps and a supporting frame, carried on the back and often used by climbers, campers, etc. US and Canadian name backpack. [from German, literally: back sack]


So it seems they're just being multilingual biggrin.gif
Title: A Question of Semantics?
Post by: krissel on July 11, 2010, 02:37:32 AM
I think rucksacks tend to be more military in style and geared toward hiking, camping or traveling with lots of stuff. Backback is a more general term which encompasses all styles of pack that would have shoulder straps but possibly more contemporary in looks, material, color, etc. Usually the rucksacks are available in browns, greens and other dark colors.

Rucksacks are backpacks but maybe not all backpacks could be called rucksacks.

Got that?  wacko.gif
Title: A Question of Semantics?
Post by: Highmac on July 11, 2010, 03:10:20 AM
QUOTE(krissel @ Jul 11 2010, 08:37 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Rucksacks are backpacks but maybe not all backpacks could be called rucksacks.

Got that?  wacko.gif

Really, it's far too early on a Sunday morning....  huh.gif
Title: A Question of Semantics?
Post by: krissel on July 11, 2010, 03:41:58 AM
Or very late for a Saturday night.... smile.gif
Title: A Question of Semantics?
Post by: dboh on July 11, 2010, 06:15:52 AM
I just finished reading a novel, One Day, by David Nicholls (who seems to be either British or Scottish), and he used "rucksack" throughout the book. I didn't get the impression that a character carrying or packing their rucksack was carrying or packing something large. It seemed to me that rucksack was British-speak for backpack.
Title: A Question of Semantics?
Post by: sokukodo on July 11, 2010, 02:05:27 PM
Yes, I had thought that the terms were interchangeable until I saw L.L. Beans's catalogue ... Krissel, I've always associated "rucksack" with "old" military (WWI, for instance), and seemed to have a faint English/German connotation ... having said all this, I bought a rucksack (it's on its way now): http://www.llbean.com/llb/shop/49400?paren...tn&cat4=816 ... been looking for a decent "backpack" for my daily walks (love my hickory walking stick).
Title: A Question of Semantics?
Post by: Xairbusdriver on July 11, 2010, 02:37:52 PM
...What a minefield so many seem unaware of entering! eek2.gif

BTW, kriss, what is a "contemporary...color?"
QUOTE
more contemporary in looks, material, color
I was under the impression that all colors have been around since the beginning of time, if not longer. Are you saying that there are more recent, contemporary colors that were not know dozens/hundreds/thousands/millions or years ago? dntknw.gif

BTW, sokukodo, successful as L.L. Bean is, they do not, yet, have control of the 'American' language... "rotfl:
Title: A Question of Semantics?
Post by: sokukodo on July 11, 2010, 06:00:14 PM
I think you're correct, Xbd!
Title: A Question of Semantics?
Post by: gunug on July 11, 2010, 08:55:24 PM
QUOTE
I think you're correct, Xbd!

I have always had a belief, disputing what L.L. Bean might think, a rucksack has no frame but a backpack "might" and probably does have a frame. What is a kit-bag?  I know about all the other slang used in this song XABD! wink.gif

QUOTE
Pack up your troubles in your old kit-bag,
And smile, smile, smile,
While you’ve a lucifer to light your fag,
Smile, boys, that’s the style.
What’s the use of worrying?
It never was worth while, so
Pack up your troubles in your old kit-bag,
And smile, smile, smile.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pack_Up_Your_...our_Old_Kit-Bag

I love the Dutch version of the song; not because I can read the lyrics but it "sounded" fantastic when I heard it at the Liberty Memorial (Kansas City WWI Museum):

    Pak al je zorgen in je plunjezak en fluit, fluit, fluit!
    Aan alle moeilijkheden heb je lak, fluit man en 't is uit!
    Waarom zou je treuren, het helpt je niet vooruit,
    Dus: pak al je zorgen in je plunjezak en fluit, fluit, fluit

This is copied from the Wikipedia website; I'd like the other lyrics but I'll search for them as well!
Title: A Question of Semantics?
Post by: gunug on July 11, 2010, 09:39:52 PM
Nevermind: I'm off to pack all my troubles into a rucksack because they're too big for my kitbag!   whistling.gif

Package already you look in your togs pocket and whistle, whistle, whistle!
To all difficulties have you lake, whistles man and ' t is from!
Why you would lament, it does not help you,
Therefore: package already you look in your togs pocket and whistle, whistle, whistle

This is Babelfish Dutch to English for:

Pak al je zorgen in je plunjezak en fluit, fluit, fluit!
Aan alle moeilijkheden heb je lak, fluit man en 't is uit!
Waarom zou je treuren, het helpt je niet vooruit,
Dus: pak al je zorgen in je plunjezak en fluit, fluit, fluit

I wonder what would happen if I translated English to Dutch again on the same page (with apologies to Dutch speakers):

Het pakket reeds u kijkt in uw plunjezak en het fluitje, fluit, fluit!
Aan allen hebben de moeilijkheden u meer, fluitjesmens en ' t is van!
Waarom u zou betreuren, helpt het u niet, Daarom:
pakket reeds u in uw plunjezak kijkt en het


Oddly enough "nevermind" in Dutch is "nevermind" in English!

If you translate the entire webpage and cut out what the above says you get this in DoubleDutch:

Nevermind: Ik moet weg al mijn problemen in een rugzak inpakken omdat zij voor mijn kitbag te groot zijn! whistling.gif

Het pakket reeds u kijkt in uw plunjezak en het fluitje, fluit, fluit!
Aan allen hebben de moeilijkheden u meer, zijn de fluitjesmens en 't van!
Waarom u zou betreuren, helpt het u niet,
Daarom: pakket reeds u in uw plunjezak kijkt en het fluitje, fluit, fluit

Dit is Babelfish het Nederlands aan het Engels voor:

Al van Pak je zorgen in je plunjezak en fluit, fluit, fluit!
Aan alle moeilijkheden heb je LAK, fluit is de mens Engels 't uit!
Zou van Waarom je treuren, het helpt je niet vooruit,
Dus: pak al je zorgen in je plunjezak en fluit, fluit, fluit

Ik ben wat benieuwd zou gebeuren als ik het Engels opnieuw aan het Nederlands op de zelfde pagina (met verontschuldigingen aan Nederlandse sprekers) vertaalde:

Het rietu van Het pakket kijkt in uw plunjezak en het fluitje, fluit, fluit!
Aan Allen hebben DE moeilijkheden u meer, fluitjesmens is Engels 't bestelwagen!
Uzou van Waarom betreuren, helpt het u niet, Daarom:
pakket rietu in uw plunjezak kijkt en het

Vreemd genoeg genoeg „nevermind“ in het Nederlands is „nevermind“ in het Engels! And to add to that comment Babelfish seems to work better now than in earlier days.  Maybe Yahoo has been a good influence!
Title: A Question of Semantics?
Post by: krissel on July 11, 2010, 09:49:44 PM
QUOTE(Xairbusdriver @ Jul 11 2010, 03:37 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
...What a minefield so many seem unaware of entering! eek2.gif

BTW, kriss, what is a "contemporary...color?"
QUOTE
more contemporary in looks, material, color
I was under the impression that all colors have been around since the beginning of time, if not longer. Are you saying that there are more recent, contemporary colors that were not know dozens/hundreds/thousands/millions or years ago? dntknw.gif


Actually, yes.

I doubt seriously that our prehistoric ancestors used orange, magenta, purple, chartreuse, turquoise, etc. in the coloration of their carry bags. Me thinks they were more of the animal fur colors as you see on this page of "rucksacks".

http://www.llbean.com/llb/shop/506221?nav=fn-ln

On the other hand, these pages of backpack styles, materials and colors are contemporary IMO.  smile.gif

http://www.llbean.com/llb/shop/506217?nav=fn-ln

Remember, the title of this thread is "A Question of Semantics?"   wink.gif
Title: A Question of Semantics?
Post by: gunug on July 11, 2010, 11:19:52 PM
No, I only had a single glass of white wine at lunch today; and it was a normal sized glass!   Devilish2.gif
Title: A Question of Semantics?
Post by: Highmac on July 12, 2010, 01:09:32 AM
This is NOT a thread that should be revisited at 6.30am when the last post read was Number 6..... biggrin.gif

QUOTE(dboh @ Jul 11 2010, 12:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
David Nicholls (who seems to be either British or Scottish)...

Since we're on semantics.... Saying someone is "either British or Scottish" is a bit like saying someone is "either American or Californian" smile.gif     The Britain bit of the UK (full title The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland), is made up of England, Scotland and Wales. So all Scots, Welsh and English are British – whether or not some of them like that fact wink.gif
So the Scots are unlikely to object if you call them British. Just don't, whatever you do, call them English!  rolleyes.gif  

Here endeth today's lesson biggrin.gif
Title: A Question of Semantics?
Post by: krissel on July 12, 2010, 03:22:59 AM
Yep.

Like my rucksacks/backpacks ditty (there's another term for it)....

All Scots are British but not all Brits are Scottish.  smile.gif
Title: A Question of Semantics?
Post by: kimmer on July 12, 2010, 03:44:14 AM
QUOTE(Highmac @ Jul 11 2010, 10:09 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Since we're on semantics.... Saying someone is "either British or Scottish" is a bit like saying someone is "either American or Californian" smile.gif     The Britain bit of the UK (full title The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland), is made up of England, Scotland and Wales. So all Scots, Welsh and English are British – whether or not some of them like that fact wink.gif
So the Scots are unlikely to object if you call them British. Just don't, whatever you do, call them English!  rolleyes.gif  

Here endeth today's lesson biggrin.gif

A few weeks ago we were having coffee at a local diner, and there were only 2 other tables with customers. A 'mannerless-local-guy' occupied one table, and a family of 4 was seated at the another table. We all struck up a conversation, and as they were tourists they asked about places to visit. They spoke with the loveliest Scottish brogue (is this the correct way to say this?) -- and I could have listened to them talk all day. In the midst of sharing tidbits about places to visit, the 'mannerless-local-guy' said, "Say, are you Brits?" To which the lady rather icily replied, "No. We're Scottish. We live in ..." (and they named their town which I've now forgotten).

The 'mannerless-local-guy' then said, "Well, I thought all you folks were Brits."

Boy-oh-boy, I could have made ice cubes in that room about then. biggrin.gif

The Scottish gent was very gracious and shared a brief history lesson with the 'mannerless-local-guy'.

'Twas an interesting exchange.
Title: A Question of Semantics?
Post by: gunug on July 12, 2010, 04:20:02 AM
Kimmer - I have a "disability" that often causes me to speak in the accents of people I talk with (my aunt and uncle in Wisconsin for example); I can find their accent creeping into my voice.  This is not me making fun of anything but rather paying homage to the other accent.  I would probably do the same around some Scots who were speaking English.  I might draw the line if someone were speaking a non-English language; it's the accent on English that draws me this is because I can't speak the other language.  My wife and relatives do notice the voice change and maybe their was something of this sort in your conversation (would you even realize it, I don't always until someone notices it and tells me).  I'm sure that the guy was an idiot in saying the things about "Brits" vs "Scots" though!
Title: A Question of Semantics?
Post by: Highmac on July 12, 2010, 09:54:58 AM
QUOTE(kimmer @ Jul 12 2010, 09:44 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
In the midst of sharing tidbits about places to visit, the 'mannerless-local-guy' said, "Say, are you Brits?" To which the lady rather icily replied, "No. We're Scottish. We live in ..." (and they named their town which I've now forgotten).

The 'mannerless-local-guy' then said, "Well, I thought all you folks were Brits."

Boy-oh-boy, I could have made ice cubes in that room about then. biggrin.gif


In New York we found ourselves sitting next to a couple from New Jersey and said hello. "Say, are you guys English? We're so pleased to meet you!" Frankly, it would have been churlish to respond to such a warm welcome with "Well, actually I'm Scottish", and we just went along with it, until the conversation turned in a way that made it easy to mention in passing that while Caroline is English I'm a Scot by birth. And that actually added to a very pleasant meeting. smile.gif

Brit is not bad - we use it ourselves over here. We even have The Brit Awards for pop music.

Title: A Question of Semantics?
Post by: kimmer on July 12, 2010, 02:14:07 PM
gunug, I'm not following. huh.gif I don't think these folks were faking their accent, and none of us were speaking with a fake brogue.

Neil, great story. smile.gif  This family was very gracious and Sneakers and I had a great chat with them. Personally the 'mannerless-local-guy' was annoying in more ways than one. I wanted to shout, "We're really not all 'ugly Americans'!"
Title: A Question of Semantics?
Post by: gunug on July 12, 2010, 02:57:20 PM
Kimmer, I wasn't accusing you of anything; this is about human nature and I don't think I'm alone in slipping into another accent.  I also don't think people necessary know when the accent is broadening out or when it disappears entirely like a friend of my fathers (a guy from Panama) who almost sounded like he was from the American South at times.  I've heard the Scottish accent spoken by people from the Chesapeake Bay; there is an island out in the middle of it that has people who speak with a broad "English" accent.  Also there are people with accidental brain injuries who speak with a variety of accents or purportedly in another language (although how that could happen without knowledge of the other language I don't know)!
Title: A Question of Semantics?
Post by: dboh on July 12, 2010, 06:30:14 PM
QUOTE(Highmac @ Jul 12 2010, 02:09 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
So the Scots are unlikely to object if you call them British. Just don't, whatever you do, call them English!  rolleyes.gif  

Here endeth today's lesson biggrin.gif



Sorry, it's the ex-history major in me, misusing the word "Brit," and I apologize for having conflated Brit with English Having known a few Scotsmen over the years (and programmers at that), I know very well that they don't consider themselves to be English. But because I found that the author was using both Scottish and British expressions (therefore not being sure where he was from), I couldn't be sure what he was referring to as a "rucksack."
Title: A Question of Semantics?
Post by: kimmer on July 12, 2010, 11:37:39 PM
QUOTE(gunug @ Jul 12 2010, 11:57 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Kimmer, I wasn't accusing you of anything; this is about human nature and I don't think I'm alone in slipping into another accent.

Thanks for 'splaining, gunug. Sorry I misunderstood. As to slipping into other accents ... years ago I spent 2 days in South Carolina visiting friends and went home to Chicago with an accent that drove my grandma nuts. She finally yelled at me to knock it off. I wasn't even aware I was speakin' Southern as she put it. Now if I spend an hour on the phone with family from Chicago, my twang is back. If I hang around the Canadian relatives, I'm very quickly sounding like them; and yes, I could easily have started imitating that Scottish family. So, no, you're not alone. smile.gif
Title: A Question of Semantics?
Post by: sokukodo on July 13, 2010, 04:51:53 PM

"...years ago I spent 2 days in South Carolina visiting friends and went home to Chicago with an accent that drove my grandma nuts." ... As a South Carolinian, I must say that it's y'all that have the accent! happy.gif
Title: A Question of Semantics?
Post by: sokukodo on July 14, 2010, 09:37:36 AM
Today, my "rucksack" arrived, and, I must say, is really quite like a "sack" (albeit an attractive, ultra-durable one), and the first thing that one notices is the absence of a zippered main enclosure: there is a drawstring that can be cinched tightly with a large flap that covers that which has been cinched. Relative to a backpack, which usually zips at the top and is a sort of rectangular solid, the rucksack (at least in LL Bean's version) is more of a cylindrical solid. And, of course, there is the usual array of pockets, both inside the enclosure and out. cool.gif
Title: A Question of Semantics?
Post by: gunug on July 16, 2010, 11:28:07 PM
I went to a camping supply store yesterday when they were having the "annual" event known as the sidewalk sale.  It was wild but the wildest thing was the number and variety of rucksacks and backpacks.  I now think a rucksack may be a smaller backpack (whatever it's color) that is without the frame.  I think you may think of the kit bag as a sort of purse or day pack you wear over one shoulder.  I didn't ask "anyone else" their opinion so I'm probably all wet!

Rucksack if you Google it: http://www.google.com/search?q=Rucksack&am...lient=firefox-a

Kit Bag: http://www.google.com/images?q=kit%20bag&a...l=en&tab=wi

Backpack for good measure: http://www.google.com/images?um=1&hl=e...ack&spell=1