Techsurvivors
Archives => 2003 => Topic started by: snuffysbluff on March 15, 2003, 05:31:00 AM
-
Now I gotta change my desk top to match.
-
Now, if we can get it all together......
-
Wow! What a surprise. Somebody quick--wake up Bill!!! So far, so good. Now I gotta play around here and see if there's a "Blame it on Bernie" graemlin!
Hey, just looked at my post--"TS Addict"??? Very cute, Jennie--or should I say "Ms. Administrator".
[ 03-15-2003, 07:59 AM: Message edited by: RobW ]
-
Must say I LIKE it a LOT. Very nice looking!! Thank you to all involved.
-
Worth the wait, you all is to be congratulated.
Yes indeedy.
George.
-
WOW! Great change, it's seems to be , well cleaner, modern! Isn't it nice to be addicted to Mac's!!!
-
Absolutely AWESOME!! I love it...
-
This is an awesome look! Congratulations to all involved.
-
quote:
Originally posted by RobW:
Hey, just looked at my post--"TS Addict"??? Very cute, Jennie--or should I say "Ms. Administrator".
Your Royal Highness will be just fine. Most of my sub...ahem*...friends do.
-
Nice colors!
The new theme is easy on the eyes!
-
Kris does some marvelous work!
-
WOW, what a pleasant surprize! I have sensitive eyes and this is really easy to read. Thanks!!!
-
We know this was a labor of love . Our reaction was very
positive and in keeping with the quality of Techsurvivors
membership, the response is unanimously favorable.
The layout is so much easier for these "old eyes"we will
certainly be better able to visit the site, and frequently.
Kudos plus , Kris,for the modern, logical and artistic
presentation.
-
Excellent!!!!
Does that mean we're sticking with UBB?
The new look also called for an avatar...
[ 03-15-2003, 02:31 PM: Message edited by: kps ]
-
Great new look!
-
Whoa!!! Looking good here. Great job!!! trish
-
Very clean, modern look! Good job. Now that logo, is that choice A, E, C or what? It came out quite nicely. The color scheme is excellent!
It seems to refresh slowly when I scroll. (NS 4.77) I'll see how Explorer does on Monday. The smallest text is difficult to read, but perhaps some tweaking of my settings will help. (I do have a vision exam scheduled for next Saturday!) Sorry if I'm the first to point out flaws. Most likely it's due to my settings.
Oh, and now I see that there is precious little difference in color of the topics I've visited and those I haven't. Sorry 'bout that, just being honest.
I'm glad to see that it's easy to find all the right buttons. I've experienced other BB transitions that took awhile to figure out what was going on. This layout is logical and familiar. That was a wise choice.
[ 03-15-2003, 03:21 PM: Message edited by: Gregg ]
-
Don't change a thing! Very clean design/skin. Text size is larger, had to check to see if I had forgot to unzoom! Very easy to read!
Thanks to all who put in some hours on this change! We all owe youse guys!
-
As I mentioned before, I really like the new look (great job, Kris), but I'm not sure if there's much difference in speed--which I thought was the original purpose of the change.
-
Excellent work !
I like it too. Easy to read and navigate and the graphics are terriffic!
-
I particularly like the Active Button. If that was around before, I never noticed.
I'll make a bookmark for it.
-
Hey I go skinny-dipping in this California -Bernie- rain and you guys went changed the board on me. <gr>
Looks nice,clean,neat,keen-0-jet.
I see that tiny
is back.
Now how or who is going to be able to watch that pint size boob tube anyho?
First thing I did was zip to my 'profile' in case ....
The 'profile' button being in the middle of the other buttons is bit awkward.
Is there a way to slide the 'profile' button over (left) as the first?
-
Just noticed.
That Clone garbage can go!
Seriously!
-
Just bounced into 9 to check the difference for speed etc etc as Rob W pointed out about what the change was all about in the first place.
No different in either OS or the browsers I have.
Very well could be on my end though with the rain and all. Anytime it rains heavy (1/2 inch = So.Calif standards) the world stops rotating. <gr>
[ 03-15-2003, 05:24 PM: Message edited by: Bill ]
-
The cleanest (uncluttered,) pleasing forum I've yet seen.
The colours are easy on the eyes.
Wonderful job Kris.
Thank you.
WDL
-
Glad you all approve of the change.
To be quite honest, this is plan B.
We had attempted a move to totally new software that would have potentially speeded things up, however a direct conversion was not possible without losing our membership lists or the archives. We are still checking into other possibilities and will let you all know if we find something acceptable.
In the meanwhile we hope this will suffice.
Greg , I agree that there isn't a big difference in color as to visited/new links. There is a noticeable difference in colors depending on machine settings as you know. This theme looked quite a bit darker on my folks eMac, lighter on my 9600 and the tan looked almost purple on my PB.
Anyway, I can play with the color on the visited links if you all would like?
-
Hmm. I see the link to page 1 of this thread at the bottom of page 2, but I didn't see a link to page 2 at the bottom of page 1, and I looked three times. There is a link to page 2 at the top of page 1, but there ought to be one at the bottom. I think you could do without the one at the top. Maybe it's showing up at the bottom for others??
P.S. It also seems that there is a minimum amount of window "real estate" required for a post. Some of the one line posts take up more space than it looks like they would need to. Just an observation....
[ 03-15-2003, 07:43 PM: Message edited by: Gregg ]
-
Mine shows at the top and bottom of both pages, Gregg, and I'm using Safari.
-
Audone, ya beat me to it! I was coming back to edit again and remove that bottom/top business. I discovered on another try that I had just not allowed enough time for the page to load. It is very slow on my connections today.
-
Greg you are right about that minimum space thing. We noticed it when we tested but haven't bothered to try to change it, if it can be changed.
-
OK, I changed the visited link color.
Better? Worse?
-
Looking good!
-
NIce! Clean Well organized look. My hats off to all involved. Except Harv of course LOL
-
That's Kelly Clone #1 LOL
-
quote:
Originally posted by krissel:
OK, I changed the visited link color.
Better? Worse?
I don't notice any difference here. It must be my settings. I'll have to look into that... some time.
-
Not a big thing, matter of fact it is a small thing!
Just noticed that when one uses the "qoute" tags, all the text in the "quote" and all mseeage text after it are a size of two smaller. At MFI, one used to be able to insert some 'funny' tags and cause a font face or size change, doesn't seem to work there anymore. Oh well...
Anyway, is there a setting that changes the font size in the admin area? If so, is it done manually? If so, can you add a '/size' command. If so, will you. If not,...
Also, the smaller text size shows up if you use/have a sig.
...or an edit.
Jim C.
(sig below edit text)
[ 03-16-2003, 10:40 PM: Message edited by: airbusdriver ]
-
Jim , that was the very first "quirk" I tried to chase down when we first tested. I've gone over the stylesheet several times but can't figure out why that happens.
There is a tag for "bread crumbs" that I don't understand which has 10 pt type. The rest of the body is 12. I'm suspicious of that tag but I haven't a clue what it is.
Anyone?
-
I gues this h'yar meens...we's got us'ns a new bord look, aint it jist wundarfull!!!
Thanks Kris , for your wonderful artistry...and creativity!!!
Thank you Jennie , for your creative posting titles...and many thanks to everyone else involved...TS rocks!
-
Love it. I feared we were going to get something radically different that this old codger would take weeks to figure out. Great thing is it's the same sort of set up but, as others have said, a cleaner, neater layout.
Many thanks to all concerned. Oh (sacrilege) viewing it on a PC is just as easy ('read' topics 'greyed out' and easy to spot).