Author Topic: Netscape 7 Article  (Read 1436 times)

Offline kelly

  • TS Addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 17035
    • View Profile
    • http://
Netscape 7 Article
« on: June 12, 2006, 09:02:59 PM »
Is Netscape 7 the Best Classic Mac OS Browser?

http://www.lowendmac.com/misc/06/0612.html
kelly
Veteran SuperUser

Offline antony

  • Super Duper Poster
  • ****
  • Posts: 301
    • View Profile
    • http://ant.sillydog.org/
Netscape 7 Article
« Reply #1 on: June 12, 2006, 11:47:27 PM »
QUOTE(kelly @ Jun 13 2006, 12:02 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Is Netscape 7 the Best Classic Mac OS Browser?

http://www.lowendmac.com/misc/06/0612.html

Thanks for reporting.

My Netscape Browser Archive is mentioned in that article, hence it must be a good article. wink.gif

Offline D76

  • Super Duper Poster
  • ****
  • Posts: 438
    • View Profile
    • http://
Netscape 7 Article
« Reply #2 on: June 13, 2006, 10:53:55 AM »
A less than half-baked review

Out of curiosity, I downloaded Netscape for OS 9 to discover whether it was any better than WaMCom 1.3.1. I also wanted to see whether it could load the OS X Firefox/SeaMonkey extensions that still work in WaMCom's browser and whether it would accept the URL address bar about:config pipelining tweaks.

Netscape had a habit of crippling its browsers, removing functions that Mozilla had included. This had led me to Mozilla, lo these many years ago. I wanted to find out whether Netscape had done the same with this version.

I removed everything WaMCom Mozilla — in Applications, Documents and the system folder — to ensure nothing of that version could interfere with a clean install of Netscape's version.

WaMCom has a problem with the Ars Technica site. The left side of the page is cut off — except with the forums  — so Ars was the first site I went to with Netscape. The page cutoff remained with Netscape. (A workaround is to copy any story that has the left side missing and paste it into SimpleText.)

The extensions I use in WaMCom are SmoothWheel, Prefbar, Mouse Gestures and an older version of Adblock. However, to make all these extensions visible in the Tools menu, WaMCom requires two more extensions, ExtensionUninstaller API and ExtensionManager 2, loaded in that order.

Netscape loaded Adblock with no problem, and it happily blocked ads. However, though it loaded ExtensionUninstaller and ExtensionManager, neither showed up in the Tools menu, possibly a newly discovered and further example of Netscape crippling its browsers.

I tried about:config in the URL address bar, and the settings appeared, but since no extensions would list under Tools, I didn't try changing any settings and adding any to enable pipelining.

So for me, WaMCom remains the winner. Netscape is slower than WaMCom, but that's without pipelining. And with no extensions control under Tools, downloading any more extensions was pointless. I didn't bother experimenting any further and trashed Netscape.

Offline Gregg

  • TS Addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 11748
    • View Profile
    • http://
Netscape 7 Article
« Reply #3 on: June 13, 2006, 12:16:10 PM »
I've also had better performance with WaMCom 1.3.1 (I call it Mozilla) since switching from Netscape 7.0.2 (I think - 7 something). But, I've never solved the MapQuest puzzle, among other non-appearing images.
Ya gotta applaud those bunnies for sacrificing their hearing just so some guy in Cupertino can have better TV reception.