Author Topic: OT:"What is this" thread update  (Read 2054 times)

Offline krissel

  • Administrator
  • TS Addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 14735
    • View Profile
OT:"What is this" thread update
« on: January 22, 2007, 03:10:17 AM »
Couldn't post to the original thread cause it is archived.

http://www.techsurvivors.net/forums/index....1&hl=spider

But now it has come out into the open.

http://www.siliconvalley.com/mld/siliconva...al/16498751.htm


A Techsurvivors founder

Offline dolphin

  • TS Addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 2769
    • View Profile
    • http://dolphin13.com/designsbyroy/
OT:"What is this" thread update
« Reply #1 on: January 22, 2007, 05:56:58 AM »
Aha...its getting more press and more attention. Cool  biggrin.gif
"If it aint broke; don't fixit"
Roy

Offline snuffysbluff

  • TS Addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 1374
    • View Profile
    • http://
OT:"What is this" thread update
« Reply #2 on: January 22, 2007, 06:47:41 AM »
Some of the TS speculation was right on the money.  Look.gif
Thanks for the update Kris.

Offline Gregg

  • TS Addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 11748
    • View Profile
    • http://
OT:"What is this" thread update
« Reply #3 on: January 22, 2007, 07:35:41 AM »
Shhh!

Loose lips sink ships.

unsure.gif
Ya gotta applaud those bunnies for sacrificing their hearing just so some guy in Cupertino can have better TV reception.

Offline RNKIII

  • Administrator
  • TS Addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 2160
    • View Profile
    • http://
OT:"What is this" thread update
« Reply #4 on: January 22, 2007, 04:43:34 PM »
A few more pictures and some information here

Bob K.   rnkiii
Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day; teach him to
use the Net and he won't bother you for weeks.

Offline Xairbusdriver

  • Administrator
  • TS Addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 26388
  • 27" iMac (mid-17), Big Sur, Mac mini, Catalina
    • View Profile
    • Mid-South Weather
OT:"What is this" thread update
« Reply #5 on: January 23, 2007, 03:34:35 PM »
Always ready to climb on my "naysayer" platform...

1. I certainly hope those inflatable pontoon sections are well reinforced! Hate to be in the middle of the ocean and find one damaged by hitting a swordfish at 60mph! Ouch!

2. I don't think aluminum is particularly suited to exposure to salt water. Fresh is OK.

3. Not sure how much 'spring' might be in the suspension but the high seas are not always as calm as S.F. Bay. There are advantages of single hulls when the water gets really rough. This thing looks like it would be real exciting in even 10 foot swells!

4. Slow speed turns would be easy but at the top speed, I'd, again, be leery of both the pontoons safety and the rather high center of gravity, even assuming that the engines are somewhere in the pontoons.

5. While a couple of feet of water is needed by this design, draft is solely determined by the weight of the object and its surface/submerged area. There's nothing magic about the design and the current draft, it's simply the large surface area of the pontoons compared to the relatively light structure. Load up that 'cargo' area with a few dozen troops, gear, food, ammunition, etc. and the draft may increase significantly. Nor would those troops be content to travel across many hours in such cramped quarters! Granted, the purported speeds would decrease the amount of human support items for the trip, but the resupply/maintenance needs will not really be changed. Best bet would be for that to happen by airdrop. And, if your going to do that, why not make the troop delivery the same way? dntknw.gif

I suppose, if the scaled up version could be big enough, a case could be made for deployment of some forces. But the speed, even with 'real' pontoons(!), would still be a negative factor. And a lot more effort would be needed to make the design more stealthy.

This high-speed, 'water-borne' delivery system was researched quite a bit by the Soviets several decades ago. But the design resembled more of a <'ground effect' aircraft>. However, it offered many benefits of the 'spider'; low draft, maneuverability, very low support needs, etc. But it also offered much greater speeds and much less dependence on 'high-tech' fabrics, suspensions and smooth seas, IMHO.


6. Finally, we all know that 640MB is more than enough RAM! smile.gif
« Last Edit: January 24, 2007, 11:23:08 AM by Xairbusdriver »
THERE ARE TWO TYPES OF COUNTRIES
Those that use metric = #1 Measurement system
And the United States = The Banana system
CAUTION! Childhood vaccinations cause adults! :yes:

Offline D76

  • Super Duper Poster
  • ****
  • Posts: 438
    • View Profile
    • http://
OT:"What is this" thread update
« Reply #6 on: January 23, 2007, 09:59:41 PM »
From the link:
QUOTE
Representatives of the U.S. Coast Guard and several oceanographic organizations were present at the preview of the prototype.

On Thursday, a group of invited guests headed out into the bay on a charter boat from Pier 40 as the Proteus approached from under the Bay Bridge. The craft traveled in circles around the charter boat, accelerating and turning easily, and at one point glided slowly up to within a few feet of the stalled charter.
How very Turbinia of it.
QUOTE
In trials this achieved a top speed of over 34 knots (63 km/h), so that "the passengers aboard would be convinced beyond all doubt Turbinia was Charles Parsons' winning North Sea greyhound"

As an audacious publicity stunt Parsons brought the ship uninvited to the Navy Review for Queen Victoria's Diamond Jubilee at Spithead on 26 June 1897 and in front of the Prince of Wales, Lords of the Admiralty and foreign dignitaries the Turbinia, much faster than any other ships, raced between the two lines of large ships and easily evaded the Navy's patrol boats.
History repeats itself, sorta.