I'm a little conflicted about this whole matter.
1. I don't see this as a real human problem in our world.
2. Artists who want to sign exclusive agreements should be able to do so if they wish.
3. Companies that include DRM on their products don't usually have a choice in the matter, that's a price of doing business with the content providers.
4. Consumers who want to use other companies protected products on every machine they own should expect to have problems. There ain't no free lunch, yet, even on the internet.
5. Apple had to make concessions to content providers in order to have product to sell. Asking/telling them to make it available to everyone else is not logical, to me. Even if it is considered 'monopolistic'.
How is anyone harmed by not being able to listen/watch a song/video? It's entertainment, for crying out loud. It's not something that controls our transportation, energy supply, health or safety. Who says anyone has the 'right' to use any machine to do anything with another companies delivery system?
I think most governments should stick to providing nation-wide protection from generally recognized threats to their citizens health and safety; health standards, transportation safety, ID security, education delivery standards, etc. Strange as it may seem, 'entertainment' is at the bottom of my needs list. Too many people seem to be more concerned about their wants than their needs, IMHO.
That's my 2 cents, anyway.