", it says "no such device or address." I'll look at the PDF now...
Goodear, some ISP's avoid using post 25 because it was the traditional email port that carried so much spam. In your ISP instructions for setting up email there should be something about the SMTP daemon rejecting port 25 and giving you an alternative. You have some ISP's blocking port 25 and some that don't
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1784276,00.aspIf you want detail I have an
old PDF containing a lot of info. Page 5
port 587 was picked by some large ISP's as an alternitive Over-ride port, other ISP's or Mailservers use other alternative port #'s. If the mail is rejected on one port your offering another choice.
-the message submission port-? Port 587
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2476.txtRe "
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2476.txt ", it says "no such device or address." I'll look at the PDF now...
Goodear, some ISP's avoid using post 25 because it was the traditional email port that carried so much spam. In your ISP instructions for setting up email there should be something about the SMTP daemon rejecting port 25 and giving you an alternative. You have some ISP's blocking port 25 and some that don't
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1784276,00.aspIf you want detail I have an
old PDF containing a lot of info. Page 5
port 587 was picked by some large ISP's as an alternitive Over-ride port, other ISP's or Mailservers use other alternative port #'s. If the mail is rejected on one port your offering another choice.
-the message submission port-? Port 587
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2476.txtFound it. Too complicated for me.