Author Topic: Two Good mac Articles  (Read 3092 times)

Offline kelly

  • TS Addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 17035
    • View Profile
    • http://
Two Good mac Articles
« on: June 05, 2003, 10:40:33 AM »
At least IMO. smile.gif

So What's the Truth About Apple's Market Share?

"So how can a company with so little presence in the market get so much press? Well, first and foremost, those miniscule sales figures refer to just that, sales of new products. They do not mean that Apple only has a few percent of the total number of personal computers in use."

"...Apple's users, who still account for 10% of the world's computer users, while its sales usually account for about 3% to 5% of the world global PC market."

"These factors have caused sales of new PC boxes to flatten. Dell's tremendous success in the market results, in large part, from grabbing sales from other PC companies."

http://macnightowl.com/news/2003/06/week1.htm


Why Mac Users Are Slow to Adopt OS X

http://new.lowendmac.com/musings/03/0603.html
kelly
Veteran SuperUser

Offline Xairbusdriver

  • Administrator
  • TS Addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 26388
  • 27" iMac (mid-17), Big Sur, Mac mini, Catalina
    • View Profile
    • Mid-South Weather
Two Good mac Articles
« Reply #1 on: June 05, 2003, 06:13:19 PM »
That last paragraph (in the second link) sure says it all! I just wish people who write these kinds of articles could use grammar correctly. wallbash.gif
« Last Edit: June 05, 2003, 06:13:53 PM by airbusdriver »
THERE ARE TWO TYPES OF COUNTRIES
Those that use metric = #1 Measurement system
And the United States = The Banana system
CAUTION! Childhood vaccinations cause adults! :yes:

Offline krissel

  • Administrator
  • TS Addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 14736
    • View Profile
Two Good mac Articles
« Reply #2 on: June 05, 2003, 09:49:11 PM »
Interesting note.

After reading the lowendmac article I scrolled down the page to see other items to read. At the bottom of the page they have a notation of any site that has referred more than two people to the lowend site page.

I was happy to see Techsurvivors listed (12 referrals) with a link back to us.

 biggrin.gif  B)  clap.gif


A Techsurvivors founder

Offline kelly

  • TS Addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 17035
    • View Profile
    • http://
Two Good mac Articles
« Reply #3 on: June 05, 2003, 10:08:29 PM »
That's pretty cool krissel. smile.gif

I never noticed that.

Wonder how long he's been doing it? smile.gif
kelly
Veteran SuperUser

Offline WDL

  • Poster Child
  • *
  • Posts: 34
    • View Profile
Two Good mac Articles
« Reply #4 on: June 05, 2003, 10:18:34 PM »
Good articles Jim.

Another good one is The Big Picture by Matt Deatheridge on the back page of the June '03 issue of
MacWorld Magazine. Don't think you can access it for free
though.

WDL

Offline RHPConsult

  • TS Addict
  • Posts: 7859
    • View Profile
    • http://
Two Good mac Articles
« Reply #5 on: June 05, 2003, 10:55:16 PM »
Thanks, Kelly.

I would have missed those without your suggestion(s).

Offline sandbox

  • TS Addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 7825
    • View Profile
    • http://
Two Good mac Articles
« Reply #6 on: June 06, 2003, 01:08:21 AM »
Well Kelly, I’m right there with Dan Knight, I spend time reading the upgrades and innovations, I even joined the x beta ride way back when, but it did nothing to improve my needs. For me, it complicated the process, demanded new hardware and software, but the biggest problem was the learning curve. I have to show others how it works and why they need something new, and it’s just not there. For a desktop publishing office, filing, email, telecommunication, (hotfax telephony, conferencing) OS 8.6 to 9.2 does it all, and does it on a modified G3 233 (292)500+ram and I perform more functions on this Box than most of the people I do business with. Most computers are task specific, a Doctor’s office runs 4 maybe 5 applications, as does a Lawyers office, and the suppliers I deal with use only 3 or 4. The State computers are task specific, to each their own, some have no internet access except email. My buddy who own the newspaper has a pile of G4’s, uses six programs on 99% of them and only internet access to his administration department. His kids at home have more capability than he does at work, he says, and all run OS9.

iCandy aside, I don’t see the need to go to OSX.Fastcat, spend 5 grand in hardware, software, and another 5 grand having my head examined for doing so. In the end I will have almost exactly what I have today with a whole lot less time on my hands. I’ll have to reeducate others on the process, taking them away from what they really like to do.

On a personal level I like to fiddle with code, but that’s a hobby, in the real world production is the key, and OSX really does nothing to hasten the tasks in my world.

I really think that OSX is still in beta, honestly, and until they make it user friendly, it’s only going to appeal to mac enthusiast, anti MSers, and switcher who want to be seen as thinking different. Even our local school who has at least 300 iMacs still run OS9., when asked why they don’t use the free OSX upgrade, they say, we don’t have the time to teach it, or the software to run on it. This is the case with most folks, try as I may to get them to buy a Mac for ease of use, it’s harder now because Apple made it that way, it seems to me.

I haven’t found one person running their business on OSX, no one who doesn’t find themselves defaulting to Classic for unavailable software, or just because they don’t want to loose production time teaching others a whole new way of making a paycheck.

It’s a tough sell, though the future of Mac is riding on it. I think it has to be smoother, resembling the Classic and operating in the background. whistling.gif Dixie

Offline kelly

  • TS Addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 17035
    • View Profile
    • http://
Two Good mac Articles
« Reply #7 on: June 06, 2003, 09:07:24 AM »
You make some good points SB. smile.gif

But.

Jaguar is not a Beta. The OS X Beta was a Beta.

If you haven't checked out Jag you should.

It really isn't that hard to use.

tacit wrote a very good explanation about this a while back.

Fact is, OS X can do a lot more than the Classic OS.

If you're not interested in iDVD, iMusic and all the rest, that's ok.

Otherwise it's a case of The Glass is Half Empty or Half Full. smile.gif

Focus on the problems with OS X versus Classic or look at the strengths.

The Jaguar Report: Myths and Realities Revisited

http://macnightowl.com/news/2003/03/week3.htm

http://macnightowl.com/news/index.htm
kelly
Veteran SuperUser

Offline kelly

  • TS Addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 17035
    • View Profile
    • http://
Two Good mac Articles
« Reply #8 on: June 06, 2003, 09:33:42 AM »
Responses to Dan Knight's Article. smile.gif

http://new.lowendmac.com/mail/03/0606.html#6
kelly
Veteran SuperUser

Offline chriskleeman

  • Administrator
  • TS Addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 2255
    • View Profile
    • http://www.chriskleeman.com
Two Good mac Articles
« Reply #9 on: June 21, 2003, 11:29:19 AM »
Guilty as charged by Dan  Knight.... I continue to lag behind, not really wanting to invest the enormous amount of time needed to wipe one of my drives, re-format, partition, install and then use OSX. My wife uses Jaguar on her i-book, and it does seem quite stable. It is still a clunky dog speed-wise, compared to 9.1 on my old 9600 (with a Sonnet G4 800 upgrade, and plenty of memory). Her machine has faster memory, a faster bus, and only 100hz less processor speed, and X seems much slower than 9.1 on my older machine. I am going to download the OS 9.2 helper from OWC and try that on one my drives so that I can use some of the updated features of that OS.

So, guilty as charged. I probably won't make the switch to X until I have to, when the software I already have becomes so outdated I have no choice but to switch.

Great pair of articles!
Haven't visited for a long time, and I love the new site!

CK
Just a dumb guitar player...
My Website

Offline kelly

  • TS Addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 17035
    • View Profile
    • http://
Two Good mac Articles
« Reply #10 on: June 21, 2003, 11:56:17 AM »
Nice to hear from you Chris. Stop back any time. smile.gif

We all say. Use whatever works for you. smile.gif
kelly
Veteran SuperUser

Offline Paddy

  • Administrator
  • TS Addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 13797
    • View Profile
    • https://www.paddyduncan.com
Two Good mac Articles
« Reply #11 on: June 21, 2003, 10:38:08 PM »
Finally got around to reading that article on OS X adoption. Call me weird, but I actually LIKE the save dialogue box in OS X MUCH MUCH better than the one in the classic OS. When I'm mucking about with either of my sons' Macs, both still running OS 9, I find the old save dialogue clunky, to say the least. Having to go all the way up through the folder levels, instead of simply zipping sideways? This is easier? More intuitive? HUH?

But so much of this is all what you're used to - as I've said many times before, the ONLY way anyone who has worked for years in the classic Mac OS will become comfortable in OS X is to use it - exclusively if possible - for everything. It will take a while, depending on your usage patterns. If you're using your 'puter for hours a day for all sorts of tasks, the stranger-in-a-strange-land feeling will leave pretty quickly.

Obviously, one of the bigger hurdles for most people is the required investment in new software. Running OS X and all your apps in Classic is...no fun. I waited until everything I used 99% of the time was available - and yes, plunked down a fair bit of cash in updating stuff. I usually keep my apps updated anyway though - so this wasn't only because of OS X.

My husband is a totally different kettle of fish - he is still using 8.6 on his Lombard. Part of the reason is that his Lombard won't run X - it's one of the first generation of motherboards that usually does nasty things and requires replacement by Apple in order to run X. But a much larger part of the reason is that he doesn't want to spend $1,600 updating MatLab, and FrameMaker isn't available for OS X. And, as he says, he's happy with what he has - it does what he needs it to do. Obviously, some day he will want a new Powerbook, and when that happens, he will have to update his software. He will be a natural convert when the time comes - he actually had a NeXT for 6 years (1991-97) while a professor at Oregon State and he's completely comfortable in UNIX since he uses a Sun at work. But for now...we're a three-OS household! (one of these days I'll try OS X on the souped up G3 and the old iMac...curiosity will get the better of me)
"If computers get too powerful, we can organize them into committees. That'll do them in." ~Author unknown •iMac 5K, 27" 3.6Ghz i9 (2019) • 16" M1 MBP(2021) • 9.7" iPad Pro • iPhone 13

Offline chriskleeman

  • Administrator
  • TS Addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 2255
    • View Profile
    • http://www.chriskleeman.com
Two Good mac Articles
« Reply #12 on: June 22, 2003, 07:41:30 PM »
Gee thanks Kelly! You folks at TS are a great resource , and it's great to be able to go looking around in these forums to increase my knowledge about Mac stuff in general.

Paddy, you have a good point about the save dialogue... Most of what I've done in OSX is internet related... and my comments on speed and smoothness vs. OS9 are based on that limited experience.

I may be forced into X sooner as opposed to later anyway, as some of the newer studio applications that will interface with my digital recorder are more and more  based in X...

One day, one step at a time!

CK
Just a dumb guitar player...
My Website

Offline sandbox

  • TS Addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 7825
    • View Profile
    • http://
Two Good mac Articles
« Reply #13 on: June 23, 2003, 03:25:19 AM »