Without knowing exactly what I'm talking about (I don't let that detail ever stop me!), I think the developer is creating problems where they are not needed.
There is no way to keep a layout from being disrupted when there are both fixed size objects (images) and variable sized ones (text). Even if the images sizes could be changed, even when pixel sizes are given, that would not make them more readable, just more blocky or with less visible detail.
While images are great for 'flash' and entertainment, they usually fail to provide the same quality of information that can be presented with text for those with vision problems. Sure, a picture
can be worth a thousand words. But I want information that is viewable/readable. That usually means text. And limiting a browsers ability to display text in the size that the user wants is just poor programming and not a little arrogant. It is telling the user that the developer knows what's best for him, regardless of whether or not the developer even knows what the user needs/wants.
Stop worrying about how the layout may look. That's what the W3C and CSS standards are for. Let the site developers be concerned about that. And even
they should be more concerned about following those same standards, so the site is usable on
any browser, be it Safari or IE on a Mac/PC or whatever is available on a PDA, cell phone or webTV (shudder!).
Of course, that's just my opinion and what's that worth?!
I'm just a user...
Jim C.