What disturbs me is not that the 'bugs' are obscure, that's usually the case, anyway. What bothers me is that these 'experts' also create and publish code that can make use of the vulnerabilities. That puts almost every OSX user at risk until a fix is posted. Fortunately, a programmer <
Landon Fuller> who used to work for Apple has been able to create patches for each bug, so far. Amazingly, he doesn't get any advance alert about what each new, daily bug will be and yet he has been able to create a fix within hours. I wonder how long it took the 'experts' to find and create
their list?
Is it perhaps easier to fix Unix bugs because the core is more secure to begin with?
Of course, the 'experts' claim they are getting no 'reward' from their effort. I suspect they would get even less 'reward' if they simply stated/explained the bugs and didn't also create a way ti access/use them.
Their only claim of credulity, to me, is that their method forces the developer(s) to take them seriously, sooner. In my view, that also means the developer(s) have to work on fixes that haven't even become live problems, instead of creating other improvements. Oh well, hope they enjoy their 15 minutes/seconds...