« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Panther Benchmark tests  (Read 1642 times)

Offline Paddy

  • Administrator
  • TS Addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 13797
    • View Profile
    • https://www.paddyduncan.com
Panther Benchmark tests
« on: October 27, 2003, 12:41:07 PM »
http://eshop.macsales.com/Reviews/Framewor...02403/main.html

One thing's for sure...those 2GHz dualies beat the pants off everything else!  tongue.gif
Logged
"If computers get too powerful, we can organize them into committees. That'll do them in." ~Author unknown •iMac 5K, 27" 3.6Ghz i9 (2019) • 16" M1 MBP(2021) • 9.7" iPad Pro • iPhone 13

Offline CyberPet

  • TS Addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 509
    • View Profile
    • http://petrahall.se
Panther Benchmark tests
« Reply #1 on: October 27, 2003, 12:59:57 PM »
Did a comparission with my PowerBook (1GHz with 1GB RAM), before and after with XBench.

Before 10.3: 85.61
After 10.3: 98.03

Both test was run after doing disk maintenance and defragment and a cold reboot. The most improvement was in the System Allocation test.
Logged
/Petra

Offline Bill

  • TS Addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 4615
    • View Profile
Panther Benchmark tests
« Reply #2 on: October 27, 2003, 04:21:07 PM »
Appears disk maintenance and defragmentation does make a difference.
No cold start though.

Xbench

PB (1ghz/1gb ram)
Before: 10.2.8. = 85.40
After: 10.2.8. = 90.98
10.3. = me no have yet. smile.gif
Logged
Two cans and a string powered by a big mouth

Offline CyberPet

  • TS Addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 509
    • View Profile
    • http://petrahall.se
Panther Benchmark tests
« Reply #3 on: October 27, 2003, 04:40:48 PM »
Yes, you will actually notice a difference if you run Drive 10 and then run XBench afterwards. The disk access is one part tested.
Logged
/Petra
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »