QUOTE
No one has mentioned the Jaguar 3.0 X-Type. It is all wheel drive. Has side air bags. Good gas milage. would be a great commuter car. Very comfortable and responsive and fun. Four year bumper to bumper warranty, includeing normal maintainance. I live and drive here in the Catskill Mts.
Underdog, I didn't mention many vehicles for price purposes....... or
friends own a Hyundai Santa fe who really like it, but it has one of those warranties that Kris spoke of.
http://www.hyundaiusa.com/vehicle/santafe/santafe.aspxThe VW Passat, a vehicle I drove is nice but a 4x4 starts @ $30 grand.
The Saturn's are Nice, with good numbers but I think a bit costly.
A nicely appointed Jag, built on a Ford Taurus frame is pretty spendy and has low crash ratings and residual values.
The Kia or Suzuki's are cute, inexpensive to purchase and operate but they would come in second in any crash situation.
I was also an Audi fan the Quantro was state of the art in it's day, but living in Florida doesn't require 4x4's and living in a small community doesn't even require a car, though we have a few. I'm looking forward to the day when I could leave the car driving to someone else and just walk, bike, scoot or shuttle to anywhere i need to.
Some things to consider:
The Toyota Rav4 for 2006 is a new model. Much of the safety/death rates you are seeing is not for this particular design. Theoretically the new build is larger and possibly safer but that is an unknown. I considered the RAv4 when i was looking last year but passed on it for two reasons, the size then was no bigger overall than my Celica, believe it or not. And the side opening rear gate was just plain unusable. I was disappointed because I had been a Toyota owner for 19 years. The new model is larger but still has that dumb rear gate design.
The electronic AWD that the Rav4 has is the 'on demand' kind that senses when it is needed and kicks in. Electronic stability control is a different animal so don't confuse the two.
Despite the MPG specs that sandbox listed earlier, I get 22 mpg average using regular with my Murano (6 cyl) while my sisterer only gets around 19 mpg using super (which she shouldn't) in a 4 cyl Outback. It's real world usage that counts, not company figures.
And thanks for the info on the Subarus warranty. I guess she has to follow their regulations. My warranty isn't dependent on required/certified manintenance.
Probably the most important thing is to test drive the vehicle on various roads and under differing conditions if possible. That can make or break a choice. One of the little things that helped sell me on my car was the adjustable foot pedals, since my legs are short compared to my upper torso. Having the ability to move the brake and gas pedals up closer makes driving so much more comfortable and much, much safer.
But most of of all, the greatest determiner of mpg and safety is the driver. No car is perfect and you will have to give in one area to get what you want in another. And depressingly, no matter how safe the driver and the car, there are some roads and conditions that just should be avoided. Period.
Kris using High test is not a good idea on a low compression motor, it will run to cold and get bad mileage. Octane slows down the burning process. Driving style has a bearing on the result, and the link is to a gov spec site avoiding the company lean.