I don't know, SB. As one of the comments stated, t'ain't the
Internet that's broken so much as MS Windoze...a large number of the issues that he names (spyware etc.) are directly related to the insecurity inherent in Windows.
QUOTE
The internet is not broken, M.S. Windows is. The issue of unwanted email (spam) warrants some changes in the underlying structure, but the other problems are really OS problems, and Windows bears the brunt of responsiblity for this. Major structural changes to how the internet works would be unwise, and probably open up more control by either the government or Microsoft. Neither are desireable or beneficial for the end user. So who really benefits from this FUD about the internet being broken? Not too difficult to figure out...
More thoughts/comments:
http://blogs.download.com/Spyware-Hunt/post.php?p=1022Comment from Rick Wanner at SaskTel from the original article:
QUOTE
The security vendors make and so called security professionals keep deploying technology that is ill-conceived, flawed, and overly complex. Why? To attempt to satisfy protecting application technologies that are ill-conceived, flawed, and overly complex.
And Eppel himself goes on to discuss Windows at length at the end of the comments section.
My chief worry in all this is that those who haven't a CLUE about the internet (politicians etc.) will latch onto this and suddenly we'll find ourselves with "solutions" that are far, far worse than any of the problems. It happened in education (NCLB).