QUOTE(Nutterbutter @ Feb 20 2007, 10:06 PM) [snapback]119628[/snapback]
UPDATE on using AIM on the Mac.
Didn't like it at all. Went to some chat rooms and all people seem to do is talk about sex, sex, and more sex.
I thought AIM/AOL put a stop to this stuff on their chat lines. I guess not!
AOL would never put a stop to sex chat in their forums; it's arguable that that is what made AOL so popular to begin with.
Just as porn is what drove the nail in the coffin of Betamax (Sony, which licensed Betamax technology, refused to license duplication services for porn, and as a result all the commercially available porn was VHS-only, which is one of the key factors that made VHS more popular than Beta), sex talk is what made online chat into the killer app of the Internet. Any online service that attempted to regulate or censor sex talk in chat rooms would quickly shrivel and die, and possibly expose the service owners to litigation.
Remember Prodigy? Prodigy was set up to compete with AOL. It failed because Prodigy was very strict about what you could and could not say on their service. This backfired spectacularly, when Prodigy found itself the victim of a lawsuit.
You see, as long as an Internet service allows anyone to say anything they want, the Internet service is a "common carrier." A common carrier is not legally liable for the information that goes over it. If you and I talk on the telephone about a plot to kill the President, the telephone company can not be held legally responsible; if we send mail about it, the US Post Office can not be held responsible. They simply carry the conversation; they do not participate in it.
But as soon as an ISP starts regulating what people can say, the ISP is not a common carrier any more. That means the ISP is now legally responsible for everything that goes over their service; if you and I are talking on the service about something illegal, the owners of the service can be held legally responsible, and can be arrested. Prodigy found itself the target of a lawsuit alleging that its owners were legally responsible when one user used the service to slander another user.
Anyway, a service that tried to monitor and censor what its users said in a chat room would quite likely be stripped of its common carrier status, and would quickly find all its users abandoning it. When you allow people a forum to talk about anything they like, you quickly discover that a great many people like to talk about sex.
There are AIM chat rooms that are not about sex. I don't use AIM chat rooms, so I can't give you any pointers; I use iChat and Yahoo Instant Messenger, but only to chat with people I already know, not in chat rooms. (I'm "tacitr" on iChat/AIM and "franklinveaux" on Yahoo IM, in case anyone's interested.)