<< Calculated against the benefits of travel through the years, would anyone say nay? >
Time MagazineI am actually suprised at Time's courage.
The space shuttle program is not about science.
It is about money and politics.
And politics.
And money.
_________________________________________________
There were originally four space shuttles. A fifth was cobbled together out spare parts and such following the Challenger disaster.
Two down.
Three to go.
The program has now run around 20 years. The current planned lifetime of the program is another twenty years.
Care to calculate the odds?
The odds are that we are going to see seven more of the world's finest men and women blasted into kingdom come - all from the comfort of our living rooms - TWICE more over the next twenty years.
Considering that the shuttle fleet is aging - note that it is the two oldest shuttles that have already gone down - the odds are probably even greater.
Do you think we'll go three for three?
Fifteen minutes of fame is not worth another seven - or another fourteen - or another twenty one - fine men and women dying for.
I would like to see an end to this madness.
Glorifying these deaths as heroic only perpetuates the carnage.
I don't want to ever see this happen again.
And if we keep flying the shuttles - it will happen again.
And again.
And again.
It is now time to put a stop to all of this.
Before the next crew dies.
Sadly,
Epaminondas
_________________________________________________
XL
Farewell to a name and a number
Recalled again
To darkness and silence and slumber
In blood and pain.
So ceases and turns to the thing
He was born to be
A soldier cheap to the King
And dear to me;
So smothers in blood the burning
And flaming flight
Of valour and truth returning
To dust and night.
Houseman