Author Topic: Would an "ad-free" internet be worth paying for?  (Read 1167 times)

Offline gunug

  • TS Addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 6710
  • TS Palindrome
    • View Profile
Would an "ad-free" internet be worth paying for?
« on: August 21, 2014, 09:14:07 AM »
QUOTE
An ad-free internet would cost each user at least £140 a year – a sum that the vast majority of UK web users
say they would never pay, according to new research.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/news...d-free-web.html


That's apparently $230 for those of us on the west side of the Atlantic!  Would it be worth to you it to pay an internet tax to get
rid of ads?
« Last Edit: August 22, 2014, 10:18:17 PM by gunug »
"If there really is no beer in heaven then maybe at least the
computers will work all of the time!"

Offline Xairbusdriver

  • Administrator
  • TS Addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 26388
  • 27" iMac (mid-17), Big Sur, Mac mini, Catalina
    • View Profile
    • Mid-South Weather
Would an "ad-free" internet be worth paying for?
« Reply #1 on: August 21, 2014, 12:47:35 PM »
Framing the question as a tax is counter productive. In my opinion, the problem is access to the net. In many countries, that is 'provided' by a corporate monopoly with no intention of killing a golden goose.
THERE ARE TWO TYPES OF COUNTRIES
Those that use metric = #1 Measurement system
And the United States = The Banana system
CAUTION! Childhood vaccinations cause adults! :yes:

Offline gunug

  • TS Addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 6710
  • TS Palindrome
    • View Profile
Would an "ad-free" internet be worth paying for?
« Reply #2 on: August 24, 2014, 09:14:49 AM »
I'm not living in the third world (although parts of Larryville are a little close to that) but I become very aggravated with advertisements.  The biggest problem I have daily is with a "very" strident ad for a tablet from the cable television we also use as an internet provider at work.  It includes video and all that I can do is mute it and so far not block it.  It's appearing on a number of news and other websites (so far not on TS).   wallbash.gif wallbash.gif wallbash.gif
"If there really is no beer in heaven then maybe at least the
computers will work all of the time!"

Offline Xairbusdriver

  • Administrator
  • TS Addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 26388
  • 27" iMac (mid-17), Big Sur, Mac mini, Catalina
    • View Profile
    • Mid-South Weather
Would an "ad-free" internet be worth paying for?
« Reply #3 on: August 24, 2014, 10:40:15 AM »
Have you tried AdBlock+, Ghostery, etc.? Assuming you can even install these kinds of things on the public property... Of course, there are Flash blockers, also. My favorite is Glimmerblocker, a System Pref.

While those and other ads can be very frustrating, I just think "ad-free" is too close to the only barely defeated SOPA and PIPA bills that were defeated last year. It would establish a minimum fee for accessing the web. We may not live in a third-world country, but the web still has the basic idea of it being a "World Wide" asset. wink.gif

While I would support changing how the Internet is regulated (from basically none right now!), I don't think setting a fee mainly to block ads is appropriate. With that method, the people/corporations are still being paid but the control is still not in the hands of the users. There is, at least, a 'mute' button on most remotes!

I think the question is becoming; do we want the web to become another commercial "Media" or remain/return to a massively available, 'people-owned' commodity and source of information. I gotta go back into into my "ivory tower"... scram.gif blush-anim-cl.gif You raise an interesting question, of course! Could there be a similar but lower fee covering only animation ads... Thinking.gif wallbash.gif
THERE ARE TWO TYPES OF COUNTRIES
Those that use metric = #1 Measurement system
And the United States = The Banana system
CAUTION! Childhood vaccinations cause adults! :yes: