Here is an article in today's New York Times about the U.S.D.A and its domination by livestock interests...
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/02/opinion/...22230dc44192ef1Here is an excerpt from the article:
Alisa Harrison has worked tirelessly the last two weeks to
spread the message that bovine spongiform encephalopathy,
or mad cow disease, is not a risk to American consumers. As
spokeswoman for Agriculture Secretary Ann M. Veneman, Ms.
Harrison has helped guide news coverage of the mad cow
crisis, issuing statements, managing press conferences and
reassuring the world that American beef is safe.
For her, it's a familiar message. Before joining the
department, Ms. Harrison was director of public relations
for the National Cattlemen's Beef Association, the beef
industry's largest trade group, where she battled
government food safety efforts, criticized Oprah Winfrey
for raising health questions about American hamburgers, and
sent out press releases with titles like "Mad Cow Disease
Not a Problem in the U.S."
Ms. Harrison may well be a decent and sincere person who
feels she has the public's best interest at heart.
Nonetheless, her effortless transition from the cattlemen's
lobby to the Agriculture Department is a fine symbol of all
that is wrong with America's food safety system. Right now
you'd have a hard time finding a federal agency more
completely dominated by the industry it was created to
regulate. Dale Moore, Ms. Veneman's chief of staff, was
previously the chief lobbyist for the cattlemen's
association. Other veterans of that group have high-ranking
jobs at the department, as do former meat-packing
executives and a former president of the National Pork
Producers Council.
The Agriculture Department has a dual, often contradictory
mandate: to promote the sale of meat on behalf of American
producers and to guarantee that American meat is safe on
behalf of consumers. For too long the emphasis has been on
commerce, at the expense of safety. The safeguards against
mad cow that Ms. Veneman announced on Tuesday - including
the elimination of "downer cattle" (cows that cannot walk)
from the food chain, the removal of high-risk material like
spinal cords from meat processing, the promise to introduce
a system to trace cattle back to the ranch - have long been
demanded by consumer groups. Their belated introduction
seems to have been largely motivated by the desire to have
foreign countries lift restrictions on American beef
imports.